Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Clinical Outcomes and Patient Recovery

Authors

  • Dr. Priya K. Mehta Author

Keywords:

Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy, laparoscopic surgery, postoperative recovery

Abstract

Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy has recently gained interest as a potential enhancement over conventional laparoscopic methods, particularly in reducing surgical trauma and improving postoperative recovery. This study evaluates clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, focusing on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay. The retrospective comparative analysis suggests that while robotic assistance may prolong operative time modestly, it is associated with reduced blood loss and significantly improved postoperative recovery metrics. These findings provide informative evidence for surgical decision-making in elective cholecystectomy procedures

References

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Clinical Outcomes and Patient Recovery. (2026). American Surgeon: Journal of Surgical Science and Medical Advances, 1(1), 5-9. https://scientajournals.com/index.php/2/article/view/36

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.